Open the sample report
Review example questions, answers, citations, competitor observations, and prioritized findings.
View sample reportYou don't.
Find why ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Perplexity cite them—not you.
Need proof before you run your own audit?See a sample report first
WHAT THE AUDIT CHECKS
The anonymous audit summarizes a small current sample. Open the report to inspect the questions, answers, and cited URLs behind it.
Records whether each sampled answer names your brand or links to your domain.
Flags whether the sampled descriptions agree with the public information found on your site.
Lists competitors that appear in the same sampled answers; it is not a market-wide ranking.
Reviews selected public page and technical signals, with findings you can verify before acting.
SEE THE OUTPUT
The sample is clearly labeled and shows the shape of a report. It is not a result for your domain.
Review example questions, answers, citations, competitor observations, and prioritized findings.
View sample reportSee the inputs and weights, then decide whether this limited score is useful for your decision.
View scoring explanationHOW IT WORKS
Check current visibility, review the evidence, and decide what to improve.
Paste a public website URL and confirm the domain you want to inspect.
The anonymous audit checks your site and asks GPT five relevant questions.
Review the sampled answers, score summary, competitor observations, and stated limitations.
SCOPE AND LIMITS
Use the result as evidence from one documented run, not as a universal measure of future AI visibility.
The anonymous audit checks 5 questions with GPT. Other systems, queries, locations, and times can produce different answers.
You can run up to 3 anonymous audits per day, limited to 1 per domain, subject to daily capacity.
The score is not a prediction or a universal probability. Inspect the underlying answers and cited URLs before acting.
Start with a limited GPT snapshot and inspect the evidence.
FAQ
Definitions, audit scope, scoring limits, and what the optional files can and cannot do.
AEO (AI Engine Optimization) is a working label for reviewing how public information may be found, summarized, or cited in AI-assisted search. It builds on SEO, content quality, technical access, and repeatable observation. It cannot ensure a citation or recommendation.
SEO covers crawlability, indexing, useful content, links, and search performance. AEO adds observation of generated answers and stricter review of public facts. llms.txt is optional, and structured data must match visible content; neither guarantees an AI citation.
The anonymous audit asks GPT five industry-relevant questions about your domain and analyzes its responses for citations, brand mentions, accuracy, and competitors. Signed-in and paid plans have separate engine and question allowances.
Without an account, you can run up to 3 anonymous audits per day, limited to 1 per domain, subject to daily capacity. Each anonymous audit checks 5 questions with 1 AI engine: GPT. The separate signed-in Free plan includes 3 full reports per month, 1 AI engine (GPT), 8 questions per report, and 7-day report history.
Our AEO reports provide recommendations tailored to your website. Common improvements include clearer FAQ content, appropriate Schema.org markup, accurate public information, and stronger topic coverage. Optional files can organize that information, but no file guarantees discovery or citations.
llms.txt is an optional community proposal for organizing links and public site information; it is not a Google ranking signal or a guaranteed AI search signal. agent.json is an experimental SkillAEO format, not an industry standard. Either file can help you organize public information, but cannot guarantee that an AI system will read, index, cite, or rank it.
The anonymous score summarizes 5 current GPT answers. Inspect the exact questions, answers, mentions, and cited URLs because a score is not a universal probability of future visibility. AI responses can vary between runs.
AI engines use their own changing retrieval and ranking systems. Clear, accurate, accessible content and corroborating sources may help them understand a site, but no markup or optional file guarantees a citation.
There is no reliable fixed timeline. Verify technical changes directly, then repeat the same documented questions and review analytics over time without assuming one site change caused every difference.
A local business can use the audit as a narrow GPT snapshot, then review its name, address, phone, hours, services, policies, profiles, and genuine reviews. No optimization or schema type guarantees a local recommendation.
RESOURCES
Use these guides to understand AEO, audit scope, planning choices, tools, services, and SaaS-specific page patterns.
Start with the core definition, how AEO differs from SEO, and what answer-readiness looks like on a real site.
See what an AEO audit checks, how it differs from an SEO audit, and which issues usually matter first.
Turn AI visibility from a vague goal into a 90-day plan with clear page priorities and measurable fixes.
Compare audit-first tools, monitoring platforms, and the features that actually matter for answer visibility.
Understand when an agency makes sense, what services should be included, and when software is enough first.
Find the page types software buyers and answer engines rely on most, from comparison pages to implementation content.